NC Fiduciary Litigation Commentary

Lord & Lindley - Lawyers in Charlotte NC
Castillo v. RRD Financial LLC Blog Post (1)

When Is a Business Dispute Not “In or Affecting Commerce”?

March 9, 2026

NC Business Court Limits Chapter 75 in Operating Agreement Case In Castillo v. RRD Financial LLC, 2025 NCBC 53, the North Carolina Business Court addressed an issue that comes up frequently in business breakups: when does an internal operating agreement dispute rise to the level of an unfair or deceptive trade practice under Chapter 75?…

Read More
Fiduciary Duty 2025 Rulings

What the North Carolina Business Court is Saying About Fiduciary Duty in 2025

January 2, 2026

Key Themes & Takeaways from This Year’s Rulings Fiduciary duty disputes continued to dominate the North Carolina Business Court docket in 2025, and this year’s decisions sent a clear message: fiduciary duties arise in narrow, well-defined circumstances — not merely because parties share an LLC, partnership, or contractual relationship. In case after case, the Court…

Read More
Executing a Judgment

What Are the Primary Methods of Executing on a Judgment?

September 25, 2025

Securing a judgment in court is only half the battle—collecting on it is where the real work begins. A judgment is a legal determination that money is owed, but courts don’t automatically ensure payment. Instead, judgment creditors must use specific legal tools to enforce the judgment and recover what they are owed. In North Carolina,…

Read More

Power Struggles, EB-5 Investments, and Fiduciary Duties: Qian v. Zheng

August 29, 2025

The North Carolina Business Court’s decision in Qian v. Zheng (2025 NCBC 46) offers a striking look at fiduciary duty disputes, internal governance battles, and the challenges of managing immigrant investor funds. The case centers on Carolina Sawmills, L.P. (“CSLP”), a North Carolina limited partnership that raised $75.5 million from 151 Chinese investors through the…

Read More

Intersal, Inc. V. Susi H. Hamilton, Et Al.: a Separate Battle Over Pirates and Treasure

June 6, 2019

In another case distinct from last week’s shipwreck blog post, salvage company Intersal, Inc. (“Intersal”) seeks to overturn a decision in favor of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (the “NCDNCR”), the Secretary for the NCDNCR, the State of North Carolina, and the now-dissolved non-profit company Friends of Queen Anne’s Revenge (“FQAR”). …

Read More

Think You Can Represent Yourself in Business Court? Think Again.

May 25, 2017

While it is legally permissible to represent yourself in Business Court, it probably is not a good idea as one plaintiff learned the hard way. In a recent decision from the North Carolina Business Court, a plaintiff, James Gillespie, attempted to be a pro se litigant and wound up with his case dismissed and responsible…

Read More

Playing by the (New) Rules in the North Carolina Business Court: Part 3

April 5, 2017

The North Carolina Business Court’s new Rules went into effect January 1, 2017 and apply to every civil action designated as a mandatory complex business case or assigned to a Business Court judge, regardless of whether it was filed prior to the Rules’ effective date. They are meant to supplement, rather than supplant, the Rules…

Read More

Playing by the (New) Rules in the North Carolina Business Court: Part 2

March 30, 2017

The North Carolina Business Court’s new Rules went into effect January 1, 2017 and apply to every civil action designated as a mandatory complex business case or assigned to a Business Court judge, regardless of whether it was filed prior to the Rules’ effective date. They are meant to supplement, rather than supplant, the Rules…

Read More

Counterclaims: When to Designate a Case to the North Carolina Business Court

March 9, 2016

          The North Carolina Business Court (“Business Court”) is a specialized forum designed to adjudicate cases involving complex and significant issues of corporate governance and commercial law.  If a dispute involves one of the subject matters enumerated in North Carolina General Statute § 74-45.4, then the case shall be designated and…

Read More

North Carolina Business Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement Prohibiting Discovery, Live Testimony, and a Full Hearing

February 24, 2016

          In a January 2016 (unpublished) order, the North Carolina Business Court (NCBC) enforced a contract provision compelling arbitration and prohibiting any discovery prior to the arbitration.[1]             In Taggart v. Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc., James Taggart sold his business, Physicians Pharmacy Alliance, Inc. (“PPA”), in…

Read More

Archives